Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
call: +1.631.629.4327
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST


Medical Science Monitor Basic Research


eISSN: 2329-0358

Get your full text copy in PDF

Non-Heart-Beating Donors: Is it Worthwhile?

A Gurkan, S H Kacar, C Varilsuha, C Karaca, S Kose, M Karaoglan, F Akman, K Basak

Ann Transplant 2005; 10(2): 20-22

ID: 16809

Objective: Due to organ shortage in renal transplantation, many transplant centers attempt to increase the donor pool. Non-heart-beating donors seem to be a promising alternative.
Patients and methods: We performed 14 renal transplantations from 8 non-heart-beating donors. 2, 1, 3 and 2 donors were from groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, according to Maastricht classification.
Results: In 6 of the patients’ warm ischemia time was over 30 minutes. Three of them had primary non-function. In 6 patients delayed graft function was seen. The remaining 5 kidneys functioned immediately. Two patients whose kidney functioned returned to hemodialysis in the 11 and 13th months after their transplantations. One of the patients with primary non-function died. 9 kidneys function well in their follow-up period between 5-111 months. 1 and 5-year graft survival rates were 69.8 and 61.1 percent, respectively. The mean graft survival time is 69.9±14.5 months.
Conclusion: Despite the high primary non-function rate, we think that non-heart-beating donors especially in Maastricht classification 3 and
4 should be used due to dramatic shortage of organs

This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
I agree