The Impact of Hypothermic Pulsatile Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage: A Donor-Matched Paired Analysis in a Scenario of High Incidence of Delayed Kidney Graft Function

Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas; Silvana Daher Costa; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade; Celi Melo Girão; Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça Fernandes; Claudia Maria Costa de Oliveira; Ronaldo de Matos Esmeraldo

doi:10.12659/AOT.927010

15 December 2020: Original Paper

The Impact of Hypothermic Pulsatile Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage: A Donor-Matched Paired Analysis in a Scenario of High Incidence of Delayed Kidney Graft Function

Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas ^12ABCDEF* , Silvana Daher Costa ^12ABDEF , Luís Gustavo Modelli de Andrade ^3CDEF , Celi Melo Girão ^2BCEF , Paula Frassinetti C.B.C. Fernandes ^4DEF , Claudia Maria Costa de Oliveira ^24DEF , Ronaldo de Matos Esmeraldo ^2ADEF

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.927010

Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e927010

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

View HTML version

Table 4 Risk factors for DGF*.

	OR	95% CI	P value
	1.115	1.033–1.204	0.001
	1.011	1.004–1.019	0.004
	1.035	1.006–1.065	0.019
	2.910	1.666–5.085
	0.316	0.160–0.626	0.001
BMI – body mass index. ^* Multivariable analysis adjusted for the following variables: recipient age, gender, race, pretransplant diabetes, class I and II panel reactive antibodies, preformed donor specific antibodies, HLA mismatches; history of prior kidney transplant, donor history of hypertension, death cause, cold ischemia time, vascular anastomosis time.

Back to the Article

The Impact of Hypothermic Pulsatile Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage: A Donor-Matched Paired Analysis in a Scenario of High Incidence of Delayed Kidney Graft Function

Your Privacy