Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation Logo Annals of Transplantation

24 October 2017: Original Paper  

Negative Correlation Between Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Let-7 MicroRNA Family in Transplanted Livers: The Role of rs868 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism

Emir Ahmed Sajjad ABCDEFG 1*, Marek Radkowski ABCDE 2, Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasińska BD 3, Marek Pacholczyk B 4, Magdalena Durlik D 3, Mikołaj Fedorowicz ABD 1, Renata Pietrzak BCD 1, Bogna Ziarkiewicz-Wróblewska CD 5, Paweł Włodarski CD 1, Jacek Malejczyk D 1

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.905540

Ann Transplant 2017; 22:638-645

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic alterations of TGF-β pathway members, including its transmembrane receptor, TGFBR1, may influence the course of HCV infection. Rs868 is a single-nucleotide polymorphism of the 3’UTR region of TGFBR1, located in a binding site for the conserved let-7/miR98 microRNA family. Previously, we demonstrated a favorable course of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation in rs868 AG genotype of the transplanted liver when compared to rs868 AA. The aim of the present study was to confirm the biological effect of rs868.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: HepG2 cell line was transfected with luciferase vectors cloned with 3’UTR of TGFBR1 gene encompassing different rs868 alleles. Post-transplant liver biopsies from 61 patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease were evaluated histopathologically and analyzed for the expression of TGFBR1 mRNA, let-7/miR98 microRNAs, HCV RNA load, and rs868 genotype.

RESULTS: Luciferase expression was significantly lower in the A allele-containing vector. TGFBR1 mRNA and HCV RNA load were correlated negatively with let-7/miR98 microRNAs and this correlation was significantly stronger for rs868 AG compared to AA genotype. A strong positive correlation was demonstrated between TGFBR1 and HCV in both genotypes. In AG heterozygotes, let-7/miR98 microRNAs showed a strong negative correlation with periportal or periseptal interface hepatitis (Ishak A score).

CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative correlation between let-7/miR98 microRNAs and HCV viral load and TGFBR1 mRNA after liver transplantation. In the rs868 AG heterozygotes, this correlation was stronger and there was a negative correlation between let-7/miR98 and Ishak A score, which is in concordance with the previously demonstrated protective role of this genotype in post-transplant hepatitis C recurrence.

Keywords: Hepacivirus, Liver Transplantation

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)- associated end-stage liver disease is currently one of the leading indications for liver transplantation (LT) [1,2]. WHO estimates that 3% of the world population is infected with HCV [3]. Approximately 75–85% of infected patients develop chronic hepatitis and 10–20% of them progress to cirrhosis within 20 years [4]. According to the European Liver Transplant Registry, 13% of all LT procedures in the period from 1988 to 2009 were performed in patients in whom HCV was the sole etiology of liver cirrhosis [2]. As well as being an established risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HCV infection is also a cofactor in the progression of other liver diseases such as those related to hepatitis B infection or alcohol abuse, all of them being among the most frequent indications for LT [5]. Graft failure secondary to recurrent HCV is the most frequent cause of death, graft failure, and need for retransplantation in HCV-infected recipients [6]. All patients who undergo LT with detectable serum HCV RNA experience graft reinfection, with the HCV viral load reaching pretransplant levels in a significant portion of patients as early as on the 4th day after transplantation [7]. The high rate of hepatitis C recurrence and the accelerated course of HCV infection in LT are partially due to immunosuppressive regimens, which enable escape of the virus from specific anti-HCV immune surveillance [8–10].

Several host factors were identified that affect HCV entry, replication, assembly, and release. Among them, microRNA molecules are emerging as playing important roles [11]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs, about 22-nuceltoides in length, that regulate gene expression [12]. They exert their regulatory function after base pairing with messenger RNA using standard Watson-Crick rules [13]. The best characterized docking sites for miRNAs are located in 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTRs) of mRNAs [14]. Thus, genetic diversity in 3′UTR region may affect the miRNA–mRNA interaction, leading to genome-dependent changes in gene expression. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in 3′UTR have been described in numerous studies to alter this interaction, with a significant clinical effect [15–17]. In our previously published study, we found an association between the severity of hepatitis C recurrence after LT and rs868 SNP genotype of the donor liver, with the AG genotype carriers presenting a significantly more favorable outcome over the AA genotype carriers [18]. Rs868 is located in the 3′UTR region of TGF-β receptor type 1 gene (TGFBR1). The in silico analysis of TGFBR1 3′UTR sequences has revealed that rs868 SNP maps within a conserved binding site for miR98/Let-7 miRNAs family, thus offering a potential explanation for this effect (Figure 1) [19]. TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 are transmembrane receptors for TGF-β cytokines [20]. TGF-β is an essential mediator of fibrosis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal cell transdifferentiation [21,22] and the expression of this cytokine is upregulated in liver cells following HCV infection [23,24]. Thus, the increased levels of TGF-β may significantly contribute to liver cirrhosis, the main HCV-associated pathology, which gradually leads to organ failure. On the other hand, it is well known that TGF-β exerts systemic immune suppression and inhibits host immunosurveillance [25]. In this study, we analyzed the molecular effect of rs868 SNP on the interaction of let-7/miR-98 microRNA family and TGFBR1 mRNA. We also examined the clinical effect of these microRNAs with respect to the rs868 genotype of the transplanted liver.

Material and Methods

PATIENTS AND SAMPLE COLLECTION:

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw and was conducted according to strict institutional guidelines in accordance with 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave informed consent.

The study group consisted of 61 chronic hepatitis C patients who underwent LT and had a liver biopsy performed between January 2013 and May 2014 at the Department of General Surgery and Transplantology, Transplantation Institute, Medical University of Warsaw. Only biopsies in which HCV was the main cause of primary liver disease were included. Patients with acute rejection, confirmed post-transplant alcohol abuse, diffuse steatosis in liver biopsy, and postsurgical biliary tract complications were rejected. Possible graft arterial and venous thrombosis and cholestasis in the study group were excluded by ultrasound examination and angio-CT or cholangio-MRI.

The biopsy samples were stored immediately after the procedure in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

LABORATORY TESTS:

Evaluations of the level of AST, ALT, bilirubin, ALP, albumin, prothrombin time, and other blood parameters were routinely performed in a certified laboratory at the Warsaw Medical University Hospital.

HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS:

HCV-related graft necroinflammatory changes were scored semiquantitatively and are expressed as histological activity index (HAI) according to Ishak et al. [26]. All histological evaluations were routinely made by experienced pathologist unaware of the study design.

DNA, RNA, AND MICRORNA EXTRACTION OF THE BIOPSY SAMPLES:

DNA, RNA, and microRNA were extracted from stored donor liver biopsies using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

TGFBR1 GENOTYPING:

DNA samples were typed for rs868 using specific TaqMan® SNP genotyping assays and 7500 Real-Time PCR System with Sequence Detection software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

QUANTITATIVE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (QRT-PCR):

For mRNA quantification, RNA samples were reverse-transcribed using the Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the directions provided by the manufacturer.

Expression of TGFBR1 gene was evaluated using specific TaqMan® gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to instructions provided by the manufacturer. Reactions (25 μl) were run in triplicates on an ABI Prism 7500 apparatus (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using TaqMan® Universal Master Mix, specific primer set, and MGB probe, and 50 ng of cDNA. To compensate for differences in total mRNA amount, the samples were normalized using the human GAPDH Endogenous Control FAM/MGB probe.

For miRNA quantification, RNA samples were reverse-transcribed using the TaqMan® MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the expression of each of the let7 family miRNAs was evaluated using the TaqMan® MicroRNAAssay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in the manner described above. The RNU6B and RNU43 levels were used as internal controls. The relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔCT method.

CLONING OF 3′UTR OF TGFBR1 GENE:

The 3′UTR of TGFBR1 gene encompassing rs868 SNP was cloned from the genomic DNA of a GG homozygote for rs868 SNP. In brief, a 744 bp fragment of TGFBR1 3′ UTR region between 49174 and 49917 (NG_007461.1) was amplified by PCR using hot start Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and sense 5′GAAAGCTTTAATTCTACAGCTTTGCCTGAAC-3′ and antisense 5′TAAATAAGCTTTTTGAATTCAAACAC-3′ primers containing Hind III restriction sites. Amplification products were cloned into pJet vector (Fermentas Inc., Glen Burnie, MD). Minipreps from positive clones were Hind III digested, the released inserts were isolated from agarose gel, purified and subcloned into Hind III site of the pMIR-REPORT vector (Ambion, Austin, TX). Resulting colonies were screened by PCR to select clones with correctly oriented inserts. The selected colonies with the correctly oriented inserts were sequenced to confirm the G genotype in the rs868 locus and to rule out any other polymorphisms and mutations.

To acquire a plasmid with the A allele at the rs868 locus, the G allele-carrying vector was used as a template for mutagenesis. G to A mutagenesis was carried out using the QuikChange II Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The outcome of mutagenesis was confirmed by sequencing. Plasmids carrying G and A variant of the rs868 SNP were designated pMIR-G and pMIR-A, respectively. An empty pMIR-REPORT vector was designated as pMIR-poly.

LUCIFERASE REPORTER GENE ASSAY:

HepG2 cells were transfected in triplicates with pMIR-poly, pMIR-G, and pMIR-A plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each transfection was performed with 0.8 μg of the respective pMIR construct and 0.05 μg of the pRL-TK vector encoding Renilla luciferase (Promega, Madison, WI), which was used to normalize the assay. The cells were harvested on the following day and assayed using reagents of Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI) and the FLUOstar Omega luminometer (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). Background luminescence of the lysate from untransfected HepG2 cells was subtracted from the luminescence of samples. The results are expressed as a ratio between luminescence driven by pMIR and pRL-TK.

HCV RNA LOAD QUANTIFICATION IN LIVER BIOPSIES:

HCV RNA load was evaluated using the RNA isolated from liver biopsy samples by RT-PCR, as described previously [27]. The results were normalized to GADPH mRNA level.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Variables were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Nonparametric variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation values were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. All statistical analyses were carried out with Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). The differences between the tested variables were considered significant at p<0.05.

Results

LABORATORY TESTS AND CORRELATION TO RS868 GENOTYPE:

Basic demographics and clinical data of the evaluated patients are shown in Table 1. Of the 61 patients included in the study group, 36 had the AA genotype and 25 had AG genotype for rs868 SNP. There were 3 and 5 protocol biopsies in the AA and AG groups, respectively. The rest of the biopsies were performed due to clinical indications, based on the “first event” strategy [28]. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups.

ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF RS868 SNP:

For the evaluation of the functional significance of rs868 SNP, we obtained luciferase vectors containing a fragment of TGFBR1 3′UTR DNA with each of the G and A alleles and evaluated their effect on luciferase expression in reporter gene assay in HepG2 cells. As shown in Figure. 2, the A allele-containing plasmid (pMIR-A) conferred a strong (about 5-fold) inhibitory effect on reporter gene expression when compared to control (pMIR-poly) and G allele containing (pMIR-G)- plasmids (p=0.005 and p=0.0002, respectively).

TGFBR1MRNA AND LET-7 FAMILY MICRORNA EXPRESSION LEVELS:

There was no significant difference in the level of TGFBR1 mRNA normalized to GAPDH between the 2 genotypes. However, rs868 genotype strongly influenced the correlation between TGFBR1 mRNA level and the levels of different members of the let-7 miRNA family. A negative correlation was observed in both genotypes; it reached statistical significance and was more prominent in the AG genotype (Table 2).

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN LET-7 MICRORNAS, TGFBR1 MRNA, AND HCV RNA LOAD IN LIVER BIOPSIES:

No statistically significant difference was found between the HCV RNA load normalized to GAPDH in liver biopsies between the 2 genotypes. However, a strong negative correlation was observed between let-7 miRNAs and HCV levels only in the AG group and it reached statistical significance for let-7d, e, f, and miR98. A strongly positive and statistical significant correlation was detected between TGFBR1 and HCV RNA levels in both groups (Table 3).

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN LET-7 FAMILY MEMBERS AND CLINICAL MARKERS:

The level of let-7 miRNA molecules expression, TGFBR1 mRNA, and HCV viral load was correlated with clinical data. A negative correlation was observed between the let-7 miRNA expression levels and Ishak A, B, and C scores in the AG genotype carriers, and it reached statistical significance for let-7a, b, c, d, and f normalized to RNU6B in the Ishak A score. This correlation was mainly positive in the AA genotype carriers and reached statistical significance for let-7e normalized to RNU43 in the Ishak A score and for let-7i normalized to RNU43 in Ishak C score.

Discussion

Because miRNA molecules are an important part of cell regulatory systems, there is much potential for interplay between host cell miRNAs and viruses [29,30]. Hepatocytes are the major site of HCV replication [31]. Thus, HCV and miRNA interaction involves, most importantly, direct targeting of the HCV genome by liver-abundant miRNAs, with miR-122 being a prominent example [31,32]. MiR-122 is a liver-specific miRNA that binds directly to 5′ UTR of the virus genome at 2 adjacent sites in association with Ago2 [32]. It forms an oligomeric complex in which 1 miR-122 molecule binds to the 5′ UTR of HCV RNA with 3′ overhanging nucleotides, masking the 5′ terminal sequences from nucleolytic degradation, thereby promoting viral RNA stability and propagation of the HCV genome [32,33]. On the other hand, miRNA molecules biding directly to the HCV genome can also exert an antiviral activity. miR-199a* binds to the 5′UTR region of HCV genome and has been shown to inhibit HCV replication in an immortalized hepatocyte model [34]. Other examples of miRNAs that interact directly with HCV RNA and suppress viral replication are let-7b, miR-196, and miR-448 [35].

Alternatively, HCV virus and miRNA interaction can be based on the alteration of host signaling pathways by HCV molecules and miRNAs. For instance, HCV infection leads to overexpression of miR-130a, which in turn facilitates HCV replication by inhibiting the interferon (IFN)-induced transmembrane protein IFITM1 [36].

In the present study, the expression levels of let-7/miR-98 microRNA family members, TGFBR1 mRNA, and HCV RNA load were analyzed in liver biopsy samples taken from a set of patients in whom the sole etiology of the native liver end-stage disease was HCV infection. The influence of rs868 SNP genotype of the donor liver on these expression levels and the clinical data were assessed. Rs868 is located in the 3′UTR region of TGFBR1 mRNA. In silico analysis has demonstrated that it is located in the complementary binding site of let-7/miR-98 miRNAs, thus suggesting a biological mechanism for this effect. This mechanism was proved using the luciferase model. The clinical effect of polymorphisms located in the let-7 complementary binding site has been previously demonstrated for an SNP located in the 3′UTR region of the KRAS gene in non-small cell lung cancer [37]. In our previous study, we showed that HCV-infected liver transplant recipients carrying the rs868 AG genotype have a more favorable outcome in comparison to the AA genotype carriers in terms of severity of hepatitis C recurrence [18]. Recently, the clinical effect of rs868 has been also demonstrated in hereditary mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer (MSS HNPCC), where the A allele was a risk-associated genotype, proving the potential of this SNP for modification of the course of diseases [38].

In the present study, a negative correlation between HCV RNA load and let-7/miR-98 microRNA expression levels was observed. This correlation was influenced by rs868 genotype of the donor liver. It reached statistical significance and was more prominent in the AG genotype in comparison to AA genotype.

It has been shown previously that let-7b microRNA targets the HCV genome, leading to a decrease in HCV RNA accumulation and viral production [39]. However, although it interacts directly with HCV RNA, this effect is independent from regulation of HCV translation, as it targets the coding region of HCV NS5B protein. In the same study, let-7b and IFNα-2a was reported to express a synergistic anti-HCV activity. The exact mechanism of this effect remains unknown [39]. The findings of the present study suggest that the TGF-β signaling pathway may play a role in this effect. Interestingly, the same miRNA molecule has been shown to repress TGFBR1 protein expression in a mouse model of kidney fibrosis. Knockdown of let-7b elevated TGFBR1 expression and mimicked some of the profibrotic effects of TGF-β1 [40]. In our study, we demonstrated a strong negative correlation between let-7/miR-98 miRNA family members and TGFBR1 mRNA (Table 2). Again, it was more prominent and reached statistical significance in the AG genotype carriers for rs868, the same genotype that was advantageous in our previous study in terms of hepatitis C recurrence severity [18].

The level of TGFBR1 protein expression was not analyzed and the level of TGFBR1 mRNA expression did not show any significant difference between the 2 genotypes. However, in an ideal setting, this comparison should have been performed between AA genotype carriers and GG genotype carriers. In our study group, there were no individuals with GG genotype and the comparison was performed between AA homozygote and AG heterozygote patients, which reduces the differences in mRNA levels caused by the A allele compared to G allele. Similar difficulties in the interpretation of the influence rs868 on TGFBR1 mRNA levels has been reported previously [38. On the other hand, the interaction between let-7 miRNAs and TGFBR1 mRNA may exert its biological effect by inhibiting translation, not leading to the degradation of mRNA molecules, thus not affecting the mRNA expression levels [41]. Further studies at the protein level are necessary to elucidate this point.

The interplay between HCV and TGF-β signaling is a well-known phenomenon. While normal hepatocytes secrete only small amounts of TGF-β1, studies suggest that HCV core proteins and subgenomic replicons can directly induce TGF-β1 gene expression in hepatocytes, leading to a significant increase in TGF-β1 expression in both serum and liver [42–44]. On the other hand, the positive effect of TGF-β1 on HCV proliferation has also been demonstrated [44]. The latter is independent of the TGF-β1 effect on immunity [45]. Thus, a positive correlation between the TGF-β signaling pathway and HCV viral load can be expected. This is consistent with the results of our study, showing a strong, statistically significant correlation between TGFBR1 mRNA expression and HCV viral load (Table 3). As mentioned before, let-7 miRNA family members showed a negative correlation with TGFBR1 mRNA level and HCV viral load (Tables 2, 3). The significance of this correlation was altered by the TGFBR1 3′UTR region SNP rs868, being more prominent in the AG genotype carriers (Tables 2, 3). Thus, the previously described negative effect of let-7b miRNA on HCV RNA accumulation, also shown in our study for other let-7 miRNA molecules, may be mediated through TGF-β1 signaling.

rs868 was also influential at the clinical level. The comparison of the pathological data revealed an apparent and significant negative correlation between let-7 miRNA expression and inflammation score (Ishak A) in the AG genotype carriers for rs868, consistent with the previously reported better clinical outcome of this genotype in comparison to AA genotype (Table 4) [18]. Ishak A score is a semiquantitative measure of periportal or periseptal interface hepatitis (piecemeal necrosis)[26]. Interestingly, in a study performed on a group of 72 hepatitis B anti-Hbe positive patients by Shafaei et al., interface hepatitis was the only parameter of the Ishak grading score that correlated significantly with the serum viral load [46].

Conclusions

For the first time, we showed a negative correlation between let-7/miR98 miRNA family and HCV RNA and TGFBR1 mRNA in post-transplant livers. This effect is regulated by rs868 SNP located in the 3′UTR region of TGFBR1 mRNA and directly alters the miRNA/mRNA interaction. The G allele carriers exhibited a higher level of negative correlation between let-7/miR98 miRNA family members and each of the TGFBR1 mRNA levels, HCV RNA load, and Ishak A score. This is in concordance with the previously suggested protective role of rs868 G allele in the recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Thus, the rs868 allele genotyping can be used as a marker for predicting HCV recurrence severity. Additionally, the proven negative correlation between HCV RNA and let7/miR98 miRNAs in post-transplant livers can be a basis for the development of miRNA-based therapies. The rs868 genotype could serve as a marker of better response for such therapies.

Referenes

1. Hong Z, Smart G, Dawood M, Hepatitis C infection and survivals of liver transplant patients in Canada, 1997–2003: Transplant Proc, 2008; 40(5); 1466-70, pmid: 18589130

2. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR): J Hepatol, 2012; 57; 675-88, pmid: 22609307

3. , National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10–12, 2002): Gastroenterology, 2002; 123(6); 2082-99, pmid: 12454863

4. Chen SL, Morgan TR, The natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: Int J Med Sci, 2006; 3(2); 47-52, pmid: 16614742

5. Berenguer M, Lopez-Labrador FX, Wright TL, Hepatitis C and liver transplantation: J Hepatol, 2001; 35(5); 666-78, pmid: 11690716

6. Vinaixa C, Rubín A, Aguilera V, Berenguer M, Recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation: Ann Gastroenterol, 2013; 26(4); 304-13, pmid: 24714603

7. Garcia-Retortillo M, Forns X, Feliu A, Hepatitis C virus kinetics during and immediately after liver transplantation: Hepatology, 2002; 35(3); 680-87, pmid: 11870384

8. Charlton M, Seaberg E, Impact of immunosuppression and acute rejection on recurrence of hepatitis C: Results of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database: Liver Transpl Surg, 1999; 5(4 Suppl 1); S107-14, pmid: 10431024

9. Sugimoto K, Ikeda F, Stadanlick J: Hepatology, 2003; 38(6); 1437-48, pmid: 14647055

10. Ciuffreda D, Codarri L, Buhler L, Hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is associated with lower levels of activated CD4(+)CD25(+)CD45RO(+)IL-7ralpha(high) T cells: Liver Transpl, 2010; 16(1); 49-55, pmid: 19866484

11. Shrivastava S, Steele R, Ray R, Ray RB, MicroRNAs: Role in Hepatitis C Virus pathogenesis: Genes Dis, 2015; 2(1); 35-45, pmid: 25984557

12. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP, Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs: Genome Res, 2009; 19(1); 92-105, pmid: 18955434

13. Bartel DP, MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions: Cell, 2009; 136(2); 215-33, pmid: 19167326

14. Hammond SM, An overview of microRNAs: Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2015; 87; 3-14, pmid: 25979468

15. Zhang L, Liu Y, Song F, Functional SNP in the microRNA-367 binding site in the 3′UTR of the calcium channel ryanodine receptor gene 3 (RYR3) affects breast cancer risk and calcification: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011; 108(33); 13653-58, pmid: 21810988

16. Smits KM, Paranjape T, Nallur S, A let-7 microRNA SNP in the KRAS 3′UTR is prognostic in early-stage colorectal cancer: Clin Cancer Res, 2011; 17(24); 7723-31, pmid: 21994416

17. Preskill C, Weidhaas JB, SNPs in microRNA binding sites as prognostic and predictive cancer biomarkers: Crit Rev Oncog, 2013; 18(4); 327-40, pmid: 23614619

18. Ziarkiewicz-Wróblewska B, Sajjad E, Ciszek M, Association of 49245A>G (rs868) polymorphism in the 3′UTR of donor TGFBR1 gene with course of hepatitis C following orthotopic liver transplantation: Ann Transplant, 2014; 19; 643-51, pmid: 25502482

19. Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: Determinants beyond seed pairing: Mol Cell, 2007; 27(1); 91-105, pmid: 17612493

20. Massague J, TGF-beta signal transduction: Annu Rev Biochem, 1998; 67; 753-91, pmid: 9759503

21. Verrecchia F, Mauviel A, Transforming growth factor-beta and fibrosis: World J Gastroenterol, 2007; 13(22); 3056-62, pmid: 17589920

22. Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: New insights in signaling, development, and disease: J Cell Biol, 2006; 172(7); 973-81, pmid: 16567498

23. Kirmaz C, Terzioglu E, Topalak O, Serum transforming growth factor-beta1(TGF-beta1) in patients with cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C [corrected]: Eur Cytokine Netw, 2004; 15(2); 112-16, pmid: 15319169

24. Ray S, Broor SL, Vaishnav Y: J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003; 18(4); 393-403, pmid: 12653887

25. Yoshimura A, Muto G, TGF-beta function in immune suppression: Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2011; 350; 127-47, pmid: 20680806

26. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis: J Hepatol, 1995; 22(6); 696-99, pmid: 7560864

27. Radkowski M, Gallegos-Orozco JF, Jablonska J, Persistence of hepatitis C virus in patients successfully treated for chronic hepatitis C: Hepatology, 2005; 41(1); 106-14, pmid: 15619235

28. Vasuri F, Morelli MC, Gruppioni E, The meaning of tissue and serum HCV RNA quantitation in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: A retrospective study: Dig Liver Dis, 2013; 45(6); 505-9, pmid: 23317815

29. Roberts AP, Lewis AP, Jopling CL, The role of microRNAs in viral infection: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 2011; 102; 101-39, pmid: 21846570

30. Umbach JL, Cullen BR, The role of RNAi and microRNAs in animal virus replication and antiviral immunity: Genes Dev, 2009; 23(10); 1151-64, pmid: 19451215

31. Lindenbach BD, Rice CM, Unravelling hepatitis C virus replication from genome to function: Nature, 2005; 436(7053); 933-38, pmid: 16107832

32. Roberts AP, Lewis AP, Jopling CL, miR-122 activates hepatitis C virus translation by a specialized mechanism requiring particular RNA components: Nucleic Acids Res, 2011; 39(17); 7716-29, pmid: 21653556

33. Machlin ES, Sarnow P, Sagan SM, Masking the 5′ terminal nucleotides of the hepatitis C virus genome by an unconventional microRNA-target RNA complex: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011; 108(8); 3193-98, pmid: 21220300

34. Murakami Y, Aly HH, Tajima A, Regulation of the hepatitis C virus genome replication by miR-199a: J Hepatol, 2009; 50(3); 453-60, pmid: 19144437

35. Conrad KD, Niepmann M, The role of microRNAs in hepatitis C virus RNA replication: Arch Virol, 2014; 159(5); 849-62, pmid: 24158346

36. Bhanja Chowdhury J, Shrivastava S, Steele R, Hepatitis C virus infection modulates expression of interferon stimulatory gene IFITM1 by upregulating miR-130A: J Virol, 2012; 86(18); 10221-25, pmid: 22787204

37. Chin LJ, Ratner E, Leng S, A SNP in a let-7 microRNA complementary site in the KRAS 3′ untranslated region increases non-small cell lung cancer risk: Cancer Res, 2008; 68(20); 8535-40, pmid: 18922928

38. Xicola RM, Bontu S, Doyle BJ, Association of a let-7 miRNA binding region of TGFBR1 with hereditary mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (MSS HNPCC): Carcinogenesis, 2016; 37(8); 751-58, pmid: 27234654

39. Cheng JC, Yeh YJ, Tseng CP, Let-7b is a novel regulator of hepatitis C virus replication: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2012; 69(15); 2621-33, pmid: 22391672

40. Wang B, Jha JC, Hagiwara S, Transforming growth factor-beta1-mediated renal fibrosis is dependent on the regulation of transforming growth factor receptor 1 expression by let-7b: Kidney Int, 2014; 85(2); 352-61, pmid: 24088962

41. Selbach M, Schwanhäusser B, Thierfelder N, Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs: Nature, 2008; 455(7209); 58-63, pmid: 18668040

42. Schulze-Krebs A, Preimel D, Popov Y, Hepatitis C virus-replicating hepatocytes induce fibrogenic activation of hepatic stellate cells: Gastroenterology, 2005; 129(1); 246-58, pmid: 16012951

43. Taniguchi H, Kato N, Otsuka M, Hepatitis C virus core protein upregulates transforming growth factor-beta 1 transcription: J Med Virol, 2004; 72(1); 52-59, pmid: 14635011

44. Presser LD, Haskett A, Waris G, Hepatitis C virus-induced furin and thrombospondin-1 activate TGF-beta1: Role of TGF-beta1 in HCV replication: Virology, 2011; 412(2); 284-96, pmid: 21296375

45. Lin W, Weinberg EM, Tai AW, HIV increases HCV replication in a TGF-beta1-dependent manner: Gastroenterology, 2008; 134(3); 803-11, pmid: 18325393

46. Shafaei S, Soleimani Amiri S, Hajiahmadi M, Histological grading and staging of liver and its relation to viral loads in chronic anti-HBe positive hepatitis: Caspian J Intern Med, 2013; 4(3); 681-85, pmid: 24009960

In Press

Original article  

Diagnostic Utility of FAR1 Methylation Levels in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Liver Transpl...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.951568  

Original article  

Inferior Long-Term Outcome of Fatty Liver Allografts After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950589  

Database Analysis  

Identification and Validation of Liver Transplantation-Induced Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers Using a Bioinfo...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950289  

Original article  

Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellula...

Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.950997  

Most Viewed Current Articles

24 Aug 2021 : Review article   18,372

Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) of the Liver – Current Status and Future Perspectives

DOI :10.12659/AOT.931664

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e931664

05 Apr 2022 : Original article   14,731

Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

DOI :10.12659/AOT.935604

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604

22 Nov 2022 : Original article   14,244

Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988

Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988

29 Dec 2021 : Original article   13,752

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Sys...

DOI :10.12659/AOT.933588

Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e933588

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358
Annals of Transplantation eISSN: 2329-0358