Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
call: +1.631.629.4327
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST


eISSN: 2329-0358

Home Page

Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation.
Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time... read more

Published: 2019-05-24

Comparison of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis with 5-Year Outcome

Stavros Papachristos, Afshin Tavakoli, Raman Dhanda, Ravi Pararajasingam, Tunde Campbell, Bence Forgacs

(Department of Transplantation Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom)

Ann Transplant 2019; 24:298-303

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.912633

BACKGROUND: It is routine to implant the pancreas on the right and the renal graft on the left iliac fossa during a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant (cSPK). Ipsilateral placement of both organs on the same side raises concerns that the pancreas graft might compromise the distally placed kidney. However, ipsilateral SPK (iSPK) can be faster than the conventional contralateral graft placement and allows for preservation of the other side for future transplants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a single unit, 67 SPK transplantations (cSPK n=49, iSPK n=18) were performed from 2008 to 2011. The decision for graft placement was made during the procedure. Donor and recipient demographics, surgical complications, reoperations, surgical time, and patient and graft survival with 5-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Duration of operation was shorter in the iSPK group. Recipient and donor demographics were comparable, apart from more females receiving ipsilateral graft placement. The broader female pelvis was probably the determining factor contributing to this outcome. The iSPK group included marginally younger recipients. The ipsilateral group also demonstrated a trend to improved survival of patient, pancreas, and kidney graft, at 1- and 5-year follow-up. There was no difference in complication rates between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in overall outcomes. iSPK is a safe procedure, which proves similar patient and graft survival as with cSPK. Both procedures have comparable surgical complication rates. iSPK is a safe and quicker procedure that allows for preservation of the contralateral side for potential subsequent transplants.

Keywords: Kidney Transplantation, Organ Transplantation, Pancreas Transplantation

Related Articles (0)

Coming Soon...

Published: 2019-05-21

Urinary and Serum Biomarkers for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplan...

Lidia Lewandowska, Jolanta Małyszko, Joanna Joanna Matuszkiewicz-Rowińska

Ann Transplant 2019; 24:291-297

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.914975

Published: 2019-05-17

Prediction of Three-Year Mortality After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Adults with Pre-Transpl...

Ysabell Schwager, Simon Alexander Littbarski, Almut Nolte, Alexander Kaltenborn, Nikos Emmanouilidis, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Jürgen Klempnauer, Harald Schrem

Ann Transplant 2019; 24:273-290

DOI: 10.12659/AOT.913217